iconcharts
0

CPU Benchmarks

Over 1,000,000 CPUs Benchmarked

Samsung s5e9925

Price and performance details for the Samsung s5e9925 can be found below. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and is updated daily.

  • The first graph shows the relative performance of the CPU compared to the 10 other common (single) CPUs in terms of PassMark CPU Mark.
  • The 2nd graph shows the value for money, in terms of the CPUMark per dollar.
  • The pricing history data shows the price for a single Processor. For multiple Processors, multiply the price shown by the number of CPUs.
Samsung s5e9925

Description:

Class: Mobile/Embedded

Socket:

Clockspeed: 2.8 GHz

Cores: 8 Threads: 8

Other names: Samsung s5e9925

CPU First Seen on Charts: Q2 2023

CPUmark/$Price: NA

Overall Rank: 1449

Last Price Change: NA

Average CPU Mark
rating
6623

Single Thread Rating: 2179
Samples: 109*
*Margin for error: Low

CPU Test Suite Average Results for Samsung s5e9925

Integer Math26,142 MOps/Sec
Floating Point Math14,085 MOps/Sec
Find Prime Numbers26 Million Primes/Sec
Random String Sorting15,871 Thousand Strings/Sec
Data Encryption3,313 MBytes/Sec
Data Compression94,973 KBytes/Sec
Physics369 Frames/Sec
Extended Instructions2,561 Million Matrices/Sec
Single Thread2,179 MOps/Sec
From submitted results to PerformanceTest V10 as of 11th of May 2024.

CPU Mark Distribution for Samsung s5e9925

Submitted Baseline Distribution Graph as of 7th of May 2024
From submitted results to PerformanceTest V10 as of 7th of May 2024.
For distribution graph only: Results are trimmed to exclude outliers by disregarding the bottom 1% and top 1% of submissions.

Search for Samsung s5e9925
from the Featured Merchants below:
Amazon.com
Newegg.com
bestbuy.com
EBay.com
Note: PassMark Software may earn compensation for sales from links on this site through affiliate programs.
CPU Mark Relative to Top 10 Common Mobile/Embedded CPUs
As of 11th of May 2024 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average CPU Mark
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
25,457
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
14,185
Intel Core i5-1235U
13,460
Apple A15 Bionic
9,896
Apple A14 Bionic
8,544
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
6,698
Samsung s5e9925
6,623
Apple A13 Bionic
5,683
Intel N100
5,557
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
5,381
AMD 3015Ce
2,094
CPU Value (CPU Mark / $Price )
As of 11th of May 2024 - Higher results represent better value
Processor CPU Mark / $Price
Intel Core i5-1235U
43.56
Intel N100
43.42
Samsung s5e9925
NA
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
NA
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
NA
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
NA
AMD 3015Ce
NA
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
NA
Apple A14 Bionic
NA
Apple A15 Bionic
NA
Apple A13 Bionic
NA
Single Thread Rating
As of 11th of May 2024 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average Thread Rating
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
3,703
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
3,635
Apple A15 Bionic
3,607
Apple A14 Bionic
3,396
Intel Core i5-1235U
3,226
Apple A13 Bionic
2,320
Samsung s5e9925
2,179
Intel N100
1,959
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
1,918
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
1,770
AMD 3015Ce
1,341
Last 5 Baselines for Samsung s5e9925
Most recent listed first
Baseline CPU Mark
BL8082501 - May 08 2024
6832
BL8082274 - May 03 2024
6291
BL8081897 - Apr 25 2024
7123
BL8081820 - Apr 23 2024
7552
BL8081819 - Apr 23 2024
7552
Additional baselines can be obtained using Windows version of PerformanceTest's Manage Baselines feature.
Popular comparisons for Samsung s5e9925
As of 11th of May 2024 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average CPU Mark
Samsung s5e9925
6,623
Google GS201 vs Samsung s5e9925
7,374 (+11.3%)
QTI SM8475 vs Samsung s5e9925
7,330 (+10.7%)
Google Tensor vs Samsung s5e9925
6,739 (+1.8%)
QTI SM8250 vs Samsung s5e9925
6,563 (-0.9%)
QTI SM8350 vs Samsung s5e9925
6,551 (-1.1%)
QTI SM8450 vs Samsung s5e9925
6,379 (-3.7%)
Mediatek MT6893 vs Samsung s5e9925
6,337 (-4.3%)
Samsung Exynos 990 vs Samsung s5e9925
6,229 (-6.0%)
Samsung s5e8835 vs Samsung s5e9925
6,024 (-9.0%)
QTI SM7325 vs Samsung s5e9925
5,935 (-10.4%)
QTI SM8150 vs Samsung s5e9925
5,341 (-19.3%)
Google Tensor G3 vs Samsung s5e9925
8,136 (+22.9%)