iconcharts
0

CPU Benchmarks

Over 1,000,000 CPUs Benchmarked

Mediatek MT6889

Price and performance details for the Mediatek MT6889 can be found below. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and is updated daily.

  • The first graph shows the relative performance of the CPU compared to the 10 other common (single) CPUs in terms of PassMark CPU Mark.
  • The 2nd graph shows the value for money, in terms of the CPUMark per dollar.
  • The pricing history data shows the price for a single Processor. For multiple Processors, multiply the price shown by the number of CPUs.

Mediatek MT6889

Description:

Class: Mobile/Embedded

Socket:

Clockspeed: 2.6 GHz

Cores: 8 Threads: 8

Other names: Mediatek MT6889

CPU First Seen on Charts: Q3 2023

CPUmark/$Price: NA

Overall Rank: 1491

Last Price Change: NA

Average CPU Mark
rating
6415

Single Thread Rating: 1898
Samples: 3*
*Margin for error: High

CPU Test Suite Average Results for Mediatek MT6889

Integer Math26,583 MOps/Sec
Floating Point Math12,244 MOps/Sec
Find Prime Numbers16 Million Primes/Sec
Random String Sorting15,680 Thousand Strings/Sec
Data Encryption4,202 MBytes/Sec
Data Compression96,276 KBytes/Sec
Physics384 Frames/Sec
Extended Instructions2,352 Million Matrices/Sec
Single Thread1,898 MOps/Sec
From submitted results to PerformanceTest V10 as of 11th of May 2024.

CPU Mark Distribution for Mediatek MT6889

Submitted Baseline Distribution Graph as of 5th of May 2024


Not Enough Data from Current Version of PerformanceTest to Create Distribution Graph.

From submitted results to PerformanceTest V10 as of 5th of May 2024.

Search for Mediatek MT6889
from the Featured Merchants below:
Amazon.com
Newegg.com
bestbuy.com
EBay.com
Note: PassMark Software may earn compensation for sales from links on this site through affiliate programs.
CPU Mark Relative to Top 10 Common Mobile/Embedded CPUs
As of 12th of May 2024 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average CPU Mark
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
 25,457
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
 14,185
Intel Core i5-1235U
 13,460
Apple A15 Bionic
 9,896
Apple A14 Bionic
 8,544
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
 6,698
Mediatek MT6889
 6,415
Apple A13 Bionic
 5,683
Intel N100
 5,557
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
 5,381
AMD 3015Ce
 2,094
CPU Value (CPU Mark / $Price )
As of 12th of May 2024 - Higher results represent better value
Processor CPU Mark / $Price
Intel Core i5-1235U
 43.56
Intel N100
 43.42
Mediatek MT6889
 NA
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
 NA
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
 NA
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
 NA
AMD 3015Ce
 NA
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
 NA
Apple A14 Bionic
 NA
Apple A15 Bionic
 NA
Apple A13 Bionic
 NA
Single Thread Rating
As of 12th of May 2024 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average Thread Rating
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
 3,703
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
 3,635
Apple A15 Bionic
 3,607
Apple A14 Bionic
 3,396
Intel Core i5-1235U
 3,226
Apple A13 Bionic
 2,320
Intel N100
 1,959
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
 1,918
Mediatek MT6889
 1,898
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
 1,770
AMD 3015Ce
 1,341
Last 3 Baselines for Mediatek MT6889
Most recent listed first
Baseline CPU Mark
BL8082360 - May 05 2024
6601
BL8070759 - Oct 11 2023
5700
BL8068472 - Sep 06 2023
6944
Additional baselines can be obtained using Windows version of PerformanceTest's Manage Baselines feature.
Popular comparisons for Mediatek MT6889
As of 12th of May 2024 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average CPU Mark
Mediatek MT6889
 6,415
Google GS201 vs Mediatek MT6889
 7,374 (+15.0%)
QTI SM8475 vs Mediatek MT6889
 7,330 (+14.3%)
Google Tensor vs Mediatek MT6889
 6,739 (+5.0%)
Samsung s5e9925 vs Mediatek MT6889
 6,623 (+3.2%)
QTI SM8250 vs Mediatek MT6889
 6,563 (+2.3%)
QTI SM8350 vs Mediatek MT6889
 6,551 (+2.1%)
QTI SM8450 vs Mediatek MT6889
 6,379 (-0.6%)
Mediatek MT6893 vs Mediatek MT6889
 6,337 (-1.2%)
Samsung Exynos 990 vs Mediatek MT6889
 6,229 (-2.9%)
Samsung s5e8835 vs Mediatek MT6889
 6,024 (-6.1%)
QTI SM7325 vs Mediatek MT6889
 5,935 (-7.5%)
QTI SM8150 vs Mediatek MT6889
 5,341 (-16.7%)